This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Ethical barriers to promoting own labels in pharmaceutical retail
Yaroslavl State Medical University, Yaroslavl, Russia
Correspondence should be addressed: Olga V Zheltkevich
Revolutsionnaya str., 5, Yaroslavl, 150000, Russia; ur.tsil@amy.anihsen
Author contribution: the author made a significant contribution to the preparation of the work: he developed the concept and design of the study, collected and processed the material, wrote and edited the text in order to ensure the integrity of all parts of the article.
The article comprehensively analyzes the attitudes of pharmaceutical workers to own labels (OLs) of pharmacy chains, identifies motivation and demotivation factors in promotion of OLs, and assesses the relevance of OLs by product categories and ethics of established sales practices. As a result of an anonymous survey of pharmaceutical workers, a rating was formed on the relevance of presenting OLs in various product categories of the pharmacy range. Barriers, motivators for promotion for pharmaceutical workers when working with OLs, and tools for building customer trust when choosing OLs have been identified. The phenomenon of systemic cognitive dissonance has been established. According to it, professional doubts are suppressed by financial incentives, which looks like a conflict of interests. A model of transition from bonus promotion to an expert-oriented system is proposed.
Keywords: conflict of interest, own labels, pharmacy chains, pharmaceutical ethics, cognitive dissonance, pharmaceutical retail