2023 / 04

Следующая статья
DOI: 10.24075/medet.2023.026

ОБЗОР

К вопросу об обоснованности проведения экспериментов на животных (по материалам статьи Cameron Shelley «Why test animals to treat humans? On the validity of animal models»)

Е. Г. Луговская
Информация об авторах

Приднестровский государственный университет им. Т. Г. Шевченко, Тирасполь, Молдова

Для корреспонденции: Елена Григорьевна Луговская
ул. Карла Либкнехта, д. 160/122, г. Тирасполь, 3300, Молдова; ur.usps@akswogul

Статья получена: 21.08.2023 Статья принята к печати: 23.10.2023 Опубликовано online: 20.11.2023
|
  1. Shelley C. Why test animals to treat humans? On the validity of animal models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2010 Sep; 41 (3): 292–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.07.002.
  2. Animal Model National Human Genome Research Institute. Home. About Genomics Educational Resources. Talking Glossary of Genomic and Genetic Terms. Animal Model Available from URL: https://www.genome.gov/
  3. Chin J. Selecting a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Methods Mol Biol. 2011; 670: 169–189.
  4. Kolata G. (2004). Of mice and men: Why test animals to cure human depression? New York Times, 28 March. Available from URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/28/weekinreview/28kola.html.
  5. Гарибова Т. Л., Крайнева В. А., Воронина Т. А. Поведенческие экспериментальные модели депрессии. Фармакокинетика и фармакодинамика. 2017; 3: 14–19.
  6. Яузина Н. А., Комлева Ю. К., Салмина А. Б., Петрова М. М., Морозова Г. А., Малиновская Н. А., Герцог Г. Е. Современные экспериментальные модели депрессии. Биомедицина. 2013; 1 (1): 61–71.
  7. Catalano GD. Animals in the research laboratory: Science or pseudoscience? Between the species. 1990; 6 (1): 17–21.
  8. Greek CR, Greek JS. Sacred cows and golden geese: The human cost of experiments on animals. New York: Continuum, 2000; 227–251.
  9. Greek CR, Greek JS. Specious science. How genetics and evolution reveal why medical research on animals harms humans. New York: Continuum. 2002; 288 р.
  10. Lakatos I. The methodology of scientific research programmes. Philosophical Papers, 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1978; 237–239.
  11. LaFollette H, Shanks N. Brute science. Dilemmas of animal experimentation. London: Routledge. 1996; 286 р.
  12. Willner P. Methods for assessing the validity of animal models of human psychopathology. In A. A. Boulton, G. B. Baker, & M. T. Martin-Iverson (Eds.), Animal models in psychiatry. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press. 1991; 1–23.
  13. Holyoak KJ, Thagard P. Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1995; 320 р.
  14. Porsolt RD, Bertin A, Jalfre M. Behavioral despair in mice. A primary screening test for antidepressants. Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie. 1977; 9(2): 327–336.
  15. Shelley C. (2002b). The analogy theory of disanalogy: When conclusions collide. Metaphor and Symbol. 2002;17 (2): 81–98.
  16. Barnard N, Kaufman SR. (1997). Animal research is wasteful and misleading. Scientific American. 1997; 276 (2): 80–82.
  17. Fox MA. The case for animal experimentation. Los Angeles: University Of California Press. 1986; 278 р.
  18. Salem H. (Ed.). Animal test alternatives: Refinement, reduction, replacement. New York: M. Dekker. 1995; 349 р.
  19. Langley CK, Aziz Q, Boutra C, Gordon N, Hawkins P, Jones A, et al. Volunteer studies in pain research — opportunities and challenges to replace animal experiments: The report and recommendations of a Focus on Alternatives Workshop. NeuroImage. 2008; 42 (2): 467–473.
  20. O’Riordan T, Cameron J. Interpreting the precautionary principle. London: Earthscan. 1994; 316 р.