ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Ethical issues in disclosing diagnostic and prognostic information to cancer patients
1 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
2 INION RAS Moscow, Russia
Correspondence should be addressed: Helena V. Vvedenskaya
Ostrovityanova st. 1, Moscow; moc.liamg@anele.ayaksnedevv
Author contribution: Vvedenskaya EV — studying literature, writing an article; Lepkova NV, Egorova AV — contribution to the concept and structure of the article, editing
The article talks about the ethical dilemmas of diagnostic and prognostic disclosure in oncology. Below, we discuss the principles of diagnostic and prognostic disclosure to curable and terminally ill patients proposed by Soviet medical deontology. Despite its evolution, the principle of benevolent deception applied to incurable patients in the USSR still persists into the present. The article discusses the cons and pros of withholding the diagnosis from terminally ill patients and the Russian legislation on the patient’s rights. The article places a special focus on the strategy of disclosing an unfavorable diagnosis to a cancer patient adopted in Russian oncology.
Keywords: oncology, informed consent, informing, deontology, "benevolent deception", diagnosis