2024 / 01

DOI: 10.24075/medet.2024.005
Copyright: © 2024 by the authors. Licensee: Pirogov University.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).

OPINION

Development of neurotechnologies: ethical issues and public discussions

Khokholov AL1, Kotlovsky MYu1,2, Pavlov AV1, Potapov MP1, Gabidullina LF1, Tsybikova EB
About authors

1 Yaroslavl State Medical University, Yaroslavl, Russia

2 Central Research Institute of Healthcare Organization and Informational Support, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Mikhail Yu Kotlovsky
Revolutsionnaya Str., 5, Yaroslavl, 150000, Russia; ur.liam@yiksvoltok.u.m

Received: 2024-03-20 Accepted: 2024-03-27 Published online: 2024-03-31
|
  1. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) International Bioethics Committee, Report of the International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO (IBC) on the Ethical Issues of Neurotechnology, SHS/BIO/IBC-28/2021/3 Rev. 2021. Available from URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org /ark:/48223/pf0000378724.locale=en (accessed 10.03.2024).
  2. Doidge N. The Brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. Viking Press. 2007; 427 p. ISBN 978-8178241753.
  3. Lorach H, Galvez A, Spagnolo V, Martel F, et al. Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface. Nature. 2023; 618(7963): 126–133. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06094-5.
  4. Cinel C, Valeriani D, Poli R. Neurotechnologies for human cognitive augmentation: current state of the art and future prospects. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019; 1:3. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00013.
  5. Galaj NI. Primenenie nejrotekhnologij v kommercheskoj sfere R (na primere marketinga bankovskih depozitnyh uslug): dis. kand. ekonom. nauk: 5.2.3. Sankt-Peterburgskij gos. universitet, Sankt-Pеterburg. 2022; 315 s. Russian.
  6. International Brain Initiative Tackling Global Issues in Neuroscience Research. 2021. Available from URL: https://www.internationalbraininitiative.org/news/tackling-global-issues-neuroscience-research (accessed 10.03.2024).
  7. US National Institutes of Health Overview of the BRAIN Initiative®. 2023. Available from URL: https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/funding/brain-initiative-nidcd (accessed 10.03.2024).
  8. Korea Brain Research Institute Brief summary of Korea Brain Initiative (KBRI). Available from URL: https://www.kbri.re.kr/new/pages_eng/sub/page.html?mc=3186 (accessed 10.03.2024).
  9. Canadian Brain Research Strategy Establishing a Brain Research Initiative for Canada: Written Submission to the Standing Committee for Science and Research of the House of Commons of Canada. 2022. Available from URL: https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/441/SRSR/Brief/BR11624221/br-external/CanadianBrainResearchStrategy-e.pdf (accessed 10.03.2024).
  10. Australian Academy of Science (no date) Why Australia needs a brain initiative. Australian Academy of Science. Available from URL: https://www.science.org.au/supporting-science/other-initiatives/ausbrain/why-australia-needs-brain-initiative (accessed 10.03.2024).
  11. NeuroTech ANALYTICS Global Neurotech Industry Investment Digest. 2021. Available from URL: http://analytics.neurotech.com/neurotech-investment-digest.pdf (accessed 10.03.2024).
  12. Neurotech Reports. The Market for Neurotechnology: 2022-2026. 2018. Available from URL: https://www.neurotechreports.com/pages/execsum.html (accessed 10.03.2024).
  13. BCC Research Neurotech Devices: Global Market Outlook. 2023. Available from URL: https://secure.livechatinc.com/ (accessed 10.03.2024).
  14. Lavazza A. Freedom of thought and mental integrity: The moral requirements for any neural prosthesis. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2018; 12: 82.
  15. Gilbert F, Cook M, O’Brien T, Illes, J. Embodiment and estrangement: Results from a first-in-human ‘intelligent BCI’ trial. Science and engineering ethics. 2019; 25 (1): 83–96.
  16. UN. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York, UN. 1948. Available from URL: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights (accessed 10.03.2024).
  17. Kringelbach ML, Jenkinson N, Owen SL, Aziz TZ. Translational principles of deep brain stimulation. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience : journal. 2007; 8(8): 623–635. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2196.
  18. Zarzycki MZ, Domitrz I. Stimulation-induced side effects after deep brain stimulation — a systematic review. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2020; 32(2): 57–64. DOI: 10.1017/neu.2019.35.
  19. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics, fifth ed. New York: Oxford University Press. 2001; 454 p.
  20. UNESCO. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Paris: UNESCO. 2005. Available from URL: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (accessed 10.03.2024).
  21. Rinck PA. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. A Critical Introduction. The Basic Textbook of the European Magnetic Resonance Forum. 2023. Available from URL: https://www.trtf.eu/pubs/Textbook_AdvancedContrast.pdf (accessed 10.03.2024).
  22. Karmarkar UR and Yoon C. Consumer neuroscience: advances in understanding consumer psychology. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2016; 10: 160–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.010.
  23. Spear LP. Adolescent neurodevelopment. Journal of adolescent health. 2013; 52(2): 7–13.
  24. UN. Declaration on the commemoration of the seventy-fifth anniversary of the United Nations, United Nations General Assembly. A/RES/75/1. 2020. Available from URL: https://unacov.uk/un75-declaration/ (accessed 10.03.2024).
  25. UN. Our Common Agenda, report of the Secretary-General. 2021. Available from URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20230216065407/ https://www.un.org/en/content/common-agenda-report/ (accessed 10.03.2024).
  26. UNESCO. University of Milan-Bicocca (Italy) and State University of New York – Downstate Health Sciences University. The risks and challenges of neurotechnologies for human rights. 2023. Available from URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384185.page=%5B8%5D (accessed 10.03.2024).
  27. Zúñiga-Fajuri A, Miranda LV, Miralles DZ, Venegas RS. Neurorights in Chile: Between neuroscience and legal science. Developments in Neuroethics and Bioethics. 2021; 4: 165–179.
  28. Government of France. Charter for the Responsible Development of Neurotechnologies. Ministry of Higher Education and Research. 2022. Available from URL: https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/charte-de-developpement-responsable-des-neurotechnologies-87964 (accessed 10.03.2024).
  29. Government of Spain. Charter of Digital Rights.pdf. 2021 Available from URL: https://portal.mineco.gob.es/RecursosArticulo/mineco/ministerio/participacion_publica/audiencia/ficheros/Charter%20of%20Digital%20Rights.pdf (accessed 10.03.2024).
  30. UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office ICO tech futures: neurotechnology: Regulatory issues. ICO. 2023. Available from URL: https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/research-and-reports/ico-tech-futures-neurotechnology/regulatory-issues/ (accessed 10.03.2024).