Digital technologies are currently entering a human life and changing it drastically. Education, economy and healthcare go hand in hand with digitalization. The author of the article stresses that digital technologies spawn fear and mistrust in many people. This applies especially to digitalization of the healthcare system. To overcome the mixed feelings arising in people, we need to understand what digitalization is and review its perspectives and threats. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to consider perspective trends of digitalization of the Russian healthcare system and reveal the existing risks. The author of the article analyzes the normative legal base devoted to the development of healthcare system in Russia, examines the available articles of scientists on the subject, and analyzes the interviews undertaken by IT company representatives, which assess the use of digital technologies in medicine. Based on the performed analysis, the author underlines the following upcoming trends in healthcare digitalization: rapid data generation and processing, remote medical aid, remote enrollment in a medical institution, and easy access to an electronic medical record. The author mentions the following risks: a set of personal data, which could be stolen from digital media, mistakes existing when telehealth technologies are used, and impossibility to get access to a high-speed Internet connection in some Russian regions. According to the author, coordinated work of all actors of healthcare digitalization will allow to keep to a minimum or completely avoid the mentioned risks.
VIEWS 755
Even T. Beauchamp and J. Childress, the founders of ethical principlism, noted that in practice the principles of bioethics, which they might have formulated, may conflict, and adherence to one principle may violate the other. To date, the conflict between the principle of autonomy and the doctrine of informed consent, and the principle of vulnerability formulated ten years later (one of the principles introduced by P. Kemp) and the necessity to take care of the patient is one of the major irreconcilable conflicts. This conflict is especially severe in Russia, where the informed consent was immediately enshrined as a statutory provision without prior discussion with the medical and non-medical communities, which gave rise to numerous opportunities for misuse and abuse, and stepped up the bureaucratic pressure both on patients, who became more vulnerable, and the physicians, who started using the informed consent to their advantage, sometimes being openly market-oriented. The growth of mutual mistrust, sometimes reaching the level of aggression, forces one to find a remedy for this situation. In the author's view, this requires revision of the patient’s autonomy concept and the concept of informed consent considering the acceptance of the patient’s intense vulnerability and the patient’s need for the healthcare specialists’ (physicians and nurses) personal involvement and care. It may be helpful to consult the writings of the ethics of care, feminist ethics and other ethical trends representation, as well as the results of field research aimed to combine principles of freedom and patient care in a given situation.
VIEWS 908