2023 / 01

Следующая статья
DOI: 10.24075/medet.2023.007

ОРИГИНАЛЬНОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ

Этика исследовательской практики в клинической медицине

Л. Е. Зиганшина1,2,3, А. У. Зиганшин2
Информация об авторах

1 Российская медицинская академия непрерывного профессионального образования, Москва, Россия

2 Казанский государственный медицинский университет, Казань, Россия

3 Российский университет дружбы народов, Москва, Россия

Для корреспонденции: Лилия Евгеньевна Зиганшина
ул. Баррикадная, д. 2/1, стр. 1, г. Москва, 125993, Россия; moc.liamg@ngizel

Информация о статье

Вклад авторов: Л. Е. Зиганшина — подбор и анализ литературы, написание текста; А. У. Зиганшин — анализ литературы, редактирование текста.

Статья получена: 07.02.2023 Статья принята к печати: 05.03.2023 Опубликовано online: 13.03.2023
|
  1. Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and Efficiency. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1972.
  2. Cochrane AL 1931–1971: a critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. In: Medicines for the year 2000. London: Office of Health Economics. 1979; 1–11.
  3. Grimshaw J. So what has the Cochrane Collaboration ever done for us? A report card on the first 10 years. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2004; 171 (7): 747–749. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041255.
  4. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal. 1996; 312 (7023): 71–72. DOI: 10.1136/ bmj.312.7023.71.
  5. Matthews R, Chalmers I, Rothwell P, Douglas G. Altman: statistician, researcher, and driving force behind global initiatives to improve the reliability of health research. British Medical Journal. 2018; 361: k2588. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k2588.
  6. Altman DG. The scandal of poor medical research. British Medical Journal. 1994; 308: 283. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283.
  7. Ioannidis J. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Med. 2005; 2 (8): e124. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pmed.0020124.
  8. Chalmers I, Glasziou PP. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. The Lancet. 2009; 374: 86–89. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c3020d.
  9. Liberati A. An unfinished trip through uncertainties. British Medical Journal. 2004; 328: 531. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7438.531.
  10. Robinson KA, Goodman SN. A systematic examination of the citation of prior research in reports of randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011; 154: 50–55. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-1-201101040-00007.
  11. Clarke M, Chalmers I. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: islands in search of continents? Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998; 280: 280–282. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.3.280.
  12. Clarke M, Alderson P, Chalmers I. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002; 287: 2799–2801. DOI: 10.1001/jama.28721.2799.
  13. Cooper NJ, Jones DR, Sutton AJ. The use of systematic reviews when designing studies. Clinical Trials. 2005; 2: 260–264. DOI: 10.1191/1740774505cn090oa.
  14. Fergusson D, Glass KC, Hutton B, Shapiro S. Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding? Clinical Trials. 2005; 2: 218– 229, discussion 229–32. DOI: 10.1191/1740774505cn085oa.
  15. Clarke M, Hopewell S, Chalmers I. Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting. Lancet. 2010; 376: 20–21. DOI: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(10)61045-8.
  16. Sheth U, Simunovic N, Tornetta P 3rd, Einhorn TA, Bhandari M. Poor citation of prior evidence in hip fracture trials. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American. 2011; 93: 2079–2086. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS. J.01274.
  17. Habre C, Tramer MR, Popping DM. Elia N. Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection. British Medical Journal. 2014; 348: g5219. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g5219.
  18. Sawin VI, Robinson KA. Biased and inadequate citation of prior research in reports of cardiovascular trials is a continuing source of waste in research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2016; 69: 174–178. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.026
  19. Clarke M, Hopewell S, Chalmers I. Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2007; 100: 187–190. DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.100.4.187.
  20. Greenberg SA. How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network. British Medical Journal. 2009; 339: b2680. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2680.
  21. Bastiaansen JA, de Vries YA, Munafo MR. Citation distortions in the literature on the serotonin-transporter-linked polymorphic region and amygdala activation. Biological Psychiatry. 2015; 78: e35–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.12.007.
  22. Thornley C, Watkinson A, Nicholas D, Volentine R, Jamali HR, Herman E, Allard S, Lewine KJ, Tenopir C. The role of trust and authority in the citation behavior of researchers. Information Research. 2015; 20: 677.
  23. Perino AC, Hoang DD, Holmes TH, Santangeli P, Heidenreich PA, Perez MV, Wang PJ, Turakhia MP. Association between success rate and citation count of studies of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: possible evidence of citation bias. Circulation, Cardiovascular and Quality Outcomes. 2014; 7: 687– 692. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000912.
  24. Jannot AS, Agoritsas T, Gayet-Ageron A, Perneger TV. Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2013; 66: 296–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015.
  25. Fiorentino F, Vasilakis C, Treasure T. Clinical reports of pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: a citation network analysis. British Journal of Cancer. 2011; 104: 1085–1097. DOI: 10.1038/ sj.bjc.6606060.
  26. Robinson KA. Use of prior research in the justification and interpretation of clinical trials. Johns Hopkins University, 2009.
  27. Lund H, Brunnhuber K, Juhl C, Robinson K, Leenaars M, Dorch BF, Jamtvedt G, Nortvedt MW, Christensen R, Chalmers I. Towards evidence-based research. British Medical Journal. 2016; 355: i5440. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5440.
  28. Lund H, Brunnhuber K, Juhl C, Robinson K, Leenaars M, Dorch BF, Jamtvedt G, Nortvedt MW, Christensen R, Chalmers I. Towards evidence-based research. Kazan Medical Journal. 2019; 100 (5): 733–739. DOI: 10.17816/KMJ2019-733.
  29. Evidence-based medicine: how COVID can drive positive change. Nature. 2021; 593 (7858): 168. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-021-01255-w.