2023 / 03

Next Paper
DOI: 10.24075/medet.2023.020

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Sociocultural aspects of preconception genetic testing

Borisova AO, Nesterov RS
About authors

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Aleksandra O. Borisova
ul. Ostrovityanova, d. 1, Moscow, Russia; ur.xednay@avossirob

About paper

Financing: Russian Science Foundation project No. 19-18-00422.

Author contribution: Borisova AO — development of the article concept, preparation of resumes, review of related publications, analysis of scientific data, writing a text; Nesterov RS — review of related publications, selection of empirical data, writing a text.

Received: 2023-05-21 Accepted: 2023-08-28 Published online: 2023-09-14
|
  1. Eissenberg Joel C. Direct-to-Consumer Genomics: Harmful or Empowering, Mo Med. 2017 Jan-Feb; 114(1): 26 s.
  2. Analysis of the genetic testing market in Russia and European countries. 12/21/2021. Available from URL: https://smartconsult.group/product/ analiz-rynka-geneticheskogo-testirovaniya-v-rossii-i-stranah-evropy. Russian.
  3. Annual report of the limited liability company “Center for Genetics and Reproductive Medicine “Genetiko” for 2020 Available from URL: https://genetico.ru/wp-content/uploads/invest/Annual%20 Report_2020.pdf. Russian.
  4. Сбросить вес и продлить молодость: почему в России вырос спрос на генетические тест. 01.02.2022. Vitse-spiker Gosdumy ne uvidel smysla v zhizni bezrukoy devochki. Available from URL: https://lenta.ru/news/2017/09/12/lebedev/https://www.forbes. ru/tekhnologii/454171-sbrosit-ves-i-prodlit-molodost-pocemu-vrossii-vyros-spros-na-geneticeskie-testy. Russian.
  5. More than 26 million people have taken an at-home ancestry test. Available from URL: https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/02/11/103446/ more-than-26-million-people-have-taken-an-at-home-ancestry-test/
  6. Son IM, Senenko ASh, Savchenko ED. Center for public health and medical prevention: organizational aspects of the transition to a new format of work. Modern problems of public health and medical statistics. 2021; 2: 262–278. Russian.
  7. The National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology estimated the genetic testing market in Russia at almost 3 billion rubles. 05/22/2022. Available from URL: https://medvestnik.ru/content/news/V-NMIC-endokrinologii-ocenili-rynok-geneticheskogo-testirovaniya-v-Rossii-pochti-v-3-mlrd-rublei.html. Russian.
  8. Logacheva MD, Pushkarev VS. Foreign experience of legal regulation of direct consumer genetic testing. Actual problems of Russian law. 2021; 8:103–117. Russian.
  9. Bogdanova EE Legal problems and risks of the genetic revolution: genetic information and discrimination. Lex Russica. 2019;151(6):18–29. Russian.
  10. Revazyan KZ, Meshkov AN, Ershova AI, Sivakova OV, Drapkina OM. Psychosocial, ethical, legal and economic aspects of genetic screening for the carriage of variants that cause the development of monogenic recessive diseases. Preventive medicine. 2021;24(2):102–108. Russian.
  11. Pereira N, Wood M, Luong E, Briggs A, Galloway M, Maxwell RA, Lindheim SR. Expanded genetic carrier screening in clinical practice: a current survey of patient impressions and attitudes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(4):709–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01414-z
  12. Chuchalin AG, Grebenshchikova EG. Voluntary informed consent: history and current discussions in bioethics. M.: Veche. 2022;17– 18. Russian.
  13. Izhevskaya VL, Baranova EE. Informed consent for genetic testing. In the book: ed. Chuchalina AG, Grebenshchikova EG. Voluntary informed consent in modern medicine: theory and practice. M.: Veche. 2022;112. Russian.
  14. Rabinow P, Bennett G. Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2012.
  15. Macleod R, Craufurd D, Booth K. Patients’ Perceptions of What Makes Genetic Counselling Effective: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Health Psychol. 2002 Mar;7(2):145–56. DOI: 10.1177/1359105302007002454
  16. Maio Melissa, Carrion Prescilla, Yaremco Elyse, Austin Jehannine C. «Awareness of Genetic Counseling and Perceptions of its purpose: a survey of the Canadian public». J Genet Couns. 2013 Dec; 22(6): 762–770.
  17. Kulakov VI. The role of protecting the reproductive health of the population of Russia. Doctor. 2006; 9: 3–4. Russian.
  18. Ivanov VI, Izhevskaya VL. Traits of medical genetic counseling in Russia. Materials of the V Congress of the Russian Society of Medical Genetics. Medical genetics. 2005;4:(5): 193. Russian.
  19. Sultanaeva ZM, Sharafutdinova NKh, Khusnutdinova EK. The attitude of the female population to the methods of genetic research and forms of genetic education. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Medicine. 2010;3: 106– 108. Russian.
  20. Emanuel Ezekiel J, Persad G, Upshur R, Thome B, Parker M, Glickman A, et al. Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382:2049–2055. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114
  21. Vitse-spiker Gosdumy ne uvidel smysla v zhizni bezrukoy devochki. Available from URL: https://lenta.ru/news/2017/09/12/ lebedev/ Russian.
  22. Watanabe Motoko, Kibe Chieko, Sugawara Masumi, Miyake Hidehiko. Courtesy stigma of parents of children with Down syndrome: Adaptation process and transcendent stage/ Couns J Genet. 2022 Jun; 31(3):746–757. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1541. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
  23. Napreenko I. Delegation of agency in the concept of Bruno Latour: how to assemble a hybrid team of cyborgs and anthropomorphs? Sociology of Power. 2015; 27(1):111. Russian.
  24. Assael Baruch Maurice. Devil’s Gene. St. Petersburg. 2017;166. Russian.
  25. Lucas J. Matthews, Matthew S. Lebowitz, Ruth Ottman & Paul S. Appelbaum, Pygmalion in the genes? On the potentially negative impacts of polygenic scores for educational attainment. Social Psychology of Education. 2021;24: 789–808
  26. Rabinow P. Sociobiology and biosociality. Magazine “Human”. 2019;30 (6):16. Russian.
  27. Bryzgalina EV. Philosophy of fate in the context of genomic medicine. In the book: Grebenshchikova EG, editor-in-chief. Socio-humanitarian contours of genomic medicine. M. 2021;232 s. Russian.