REVIEW
Bioethics in the Kyrgyz Republic: experience and prospects
Research Institute of Biomedical Problems, South Branch, National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic, Osh, Kyrgyz Republic
Correspondence should be addressed: Rakhmanbek M Toichuev
Uzgenskaya str., 130-a, Osh, 723504, Kyrgyz Republic; moc.liamg@rknanpmi
Contribution of authors: Toichuev RM — preparation of information about Kyrgyz traditions; Abylayeva BA — preparation of information about educational institutions of the Kyrgyz Republic, where bioethics is taught, analysis of the state of affairs in this area; Toichueva AU — collection and preparation of information for the article; Zhilova LV — collection and processing of data for the article, drafting the article.
- Biojetika. Uchebnik pod red. Lopatina PV; Lopatin PV, Kartashova OV. 4-e izd., pererab.i. dop. M.: GEOTAR-Media. 2011; 272 s. Russian.
- Hrustalev Ju M. Biojetika. Uchebnik. Moskva: GEOTAR-Media. 2015; 400 s. Russian.
- Alekseeva TI. Adaptacija cheloveka v razlichnyh jekologicheskih nishah Zemli (biologicheskie aspekty). M.: MNJePU. 1998; 279 s. Russian.
- Biojetika i deontologija v medicine: Sb. nauch. st. pod red. Kudajbergenovoj IO. 2002; 193 s.
- Kozlov AI. Giploaktazija: rasprostranennost’, diagnostika, vrachebnaja taktika. M.: ArktAn- S. 1996; 70 s. Russian.
- Tishhenko PD. Vvedenie v biojetiku. M.: Progress-Tradicija. 1998; 384 s. Russian.
- Kozlov AI. Jekologija pitanija. M.: Izd-vo MNJePU. 2002; 183 s. Russian.
- Biomedicinskaja jetika pod red. Pokrovskogo VI. M.: Medicina. 1997; 224 s. Russian.
- Cavalli-Sforza LL, Menozzi P, Piazza A. History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton (NJ): Princeton Univ. Press. 1994; 413 p.
- Durham WH. Coevolution; Genes, Culture and Human Diversity. Stanford (CA): Stanford Univ. Press. 1991; 630 p.
- Evolution in health and disease. Ed. by Stearns SC. Oxford Univ. Press. 1999; 328 p.
- Ageeva NA, Tolmachev VG. Uchet sociokul’turnyh i psihofizicheskih osobennostej pacienta v processe podgotovki i perepodgotovki medicinskih kadrov. Prioritetnye napravlenija razvitija nauki i obrazovanija. 2016; 11(4–1): 53–55. Russian.
- Zholobova IK, Shapoval GN. Aktual’nye problemy social’noj i professional’noj otvetstvennosti uchenogo. Gumanitarnye i social’no-jekonomicheskie nauki. 2016; 86(1): 17–21. Russian.
- Kamalova ON, Zholobova IK. Osnovnye tendencii i innovacii v sisteme otechestvennogo obrazovanija. Gumanitarnye i social’nye nauki. 2016; (1): 38–48. Russian.
- Kartashova EA, Shapoval GN. Socializirujushhij potencial vneauditornoj dejatel’nosti studenta-medika. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovanija i innovacii. 2016; 58(2): 689–692. Russian.
- Kartashova EA, Shapoval GN. Sredstva i formy social’noj aktivnosti studentov vuza. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovanija i innovacii. 2016; 57(1): 698–704. Russian.
- Shapoval GN. Formirovanie nravstvennyh kachestv lichnosti studentov vuza v kontekste patrioticheskogo vospitanija. V sbornike: NAUKA SEGODNJa: vyzovy i reshenija materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Nauchnyj centr «Disput». Vologda. 2016; 168–171. Russian.
- Spicin VA. Biohimicheskij polimorfizm cheloveka. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta. 1985; 214 s. Russian.
- Potter VR. Biojetika — most v budushhee. M.: Editorial URSS, 2010; 370 s.
- Yudin BG. Transgumanizm: sverhgumaniazi ili antigumanizm? Chelovek: vyhod za predely M. 2018; 470 s. Russian.
- Agar N. How to defend genetic enhancement. Medical enhancement and posthumanity. Springer, Dordrecht. 2008; 55–67.
- Svitnev KN. Pravovye i jetichsekie aspekty posmertnoj reprodukcii. Pravovye voprosy v zdravoohranenii. 2011; 6: 30–43. Russian.
- Ageeva NA. Biojeticheskoe izmerenie problem zhizni i smerti cheloveka v uslovijah innovacionnogo obshhestva. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovanija i innovacii. 2014; 41(9–2): 5–10. Russian.
- Pagel C, Utley M, Ray S. Covid-19: how to triage effectively in a pandemic. BMJ Opinion. 2020. Available from URL: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/03/09/covid-19-triage-in-a-pandemic-is-even-thornier-than-you-might-think/ (accessed: 21.07.2024).
- Nabi J. How bioethics can shape artificial intelligence and machine learning. Hastings Center Report. 2018; 48(5): 10–13.
- Nabi J. How bioethics can shape artificial intelligence and machine learning. Hastings Center Report. 2018; 48(5): 10–13.
- Jonas G. Princip otvetstvennosti: Opyt jetiki dlja tehnologicheskoj civilizacii. M.: Ajris-press. 2004; 479 s. Russian.
- Schneider P, et al. Rethinking drug design in the artificial intelligence era. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2020; 19(5): 353–364.
- Vjalyh NA. Metodologija sociologicheskogo issledovanija neravenstva v dostupe k medicinskoj pomoshhi: nauchno-metodicheskoe posobie. Rostov-na-Donu. 2013; 186 s. Russian.
- Vjalyh NA. Strategii potreblenija medicinskoj pomoshhi: sociologicheskij analiz: monografija. Rostov-na-Donu. 2015; 288 s. Russian.
- Yudin BG. Moral’, biologija, pravo. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2001; 71(9): 775–83. Russian.
- Tishhenko PD. Institualizacija jeticheskoj refleksii v social’no raspredeljonnom proizvodstve biomedicinskih znanij. Istorija i filosofija nauki v jepohu peremen: sbornik nauchnyh statej: V 6 tomah. M. 2018; 6: 5–7. Russian.
- Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare and research. Bioethics Briefing Note. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2018; 1–8.