REVIEW

Bioethics in the Kyrgyz Republic: experience and prospects

Toichuev RM, Abylaeva BA, Zhilova LV, Toichueva AU
About authors

Research Institute of Biomedical Problems, South Branch, National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic, Osh, Kyrgyz Republic

Correspondence should be addressed: Rakhmanbek M Toichuev
Uzgenskaya str., 130-a, Osh, 723504, Kyrgyz Republic; moc.liamg@rknanpmi

About paper

Contribution of authors: Toichuev RM — preparation of information about Kyrgyz traditions; Abylayeva BA — preparation of information about educational institutions of the Kyrgyz Republic, where bioethics is taught, analysis of the state of affairs in this area; Toichueva AU — collection and preparation of information for the article; Zhilova LV — collection and processing of data for the article, drafting the article.

Received: 2024-07-24 Accepted: 2024-08-21 Published online: 2024-09-24
|
  1. Biojetika. Uchebnik pod red. Lopatina PV; Lopatin PV, Kartashova OV. 4-e izd., pererab.i. dop. M.: GEOTAR-Media. 2011; 272 s. Russian.
  2. Hrustalev Ju M. Biojetika. Uchebnik. Moskva: GEOTAR-Media. 2015; 400 s. Russian.
  3. Alekseeva TI. Adaptacija cheloveka v razlichnyh jekologicheskih nishah Zemli (biologicheskie aspekty). M.: MNJePU. 1998; 279 s. Russian.
  4. Biojetika i deontologija v medicine: Sb. nauch. st. pod red. Kudajbergenovoj IO. 2002; 193 s.
  5. Kozlov AI. Giploaktazija: rasprostranennost’, diagnostika, vrachebnaja taktika. M.: ArktAn- S. 1996; 70 s. Russian.
  6. Tishhenko PD. Vvedenie v biojetiku. M.: Progress-Tradicija. 1998; 384 s. Russian.
  7. Kozlov AI. Jekologija pitanija. M.: Izd-vo MNJePU. 2002; 183 s. Russian.
  8. Biomedicinskaja jetika pod red. Pokrovskogo VI. M.: Medicina. 1997; 224 s. Russian.
  9. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Menozzi P, Piazza A. History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton (NJ): Princeton Univ. Press. 1994; 413 p.
  10. Durham WH. Coevolution; Genes, Culture and Human Diversity. Stanford (CA): Stanford Univ. Press. 1991; 630 p.
  11. Evolution in health and disease. Ed. by Stearns SC. Oxford Univ. Press. 1999; 328 p.
  12. Ageeva NA, Tolmachev VG. Uchet sociokul’turnyh i psihofizicheskih osobennostej pacienta v processe podgotovki i perepodgotovki medicinskih kadrov. Prioritetnye napravlenija razvitija nauki i obrazovanija. 2016; 11(4–1): 53–55. Russian.
  13. Zholobova IK, Shapoval GN. Aktual’nye problemy social’noj i professional’noj otvetstvennosti uchenogo. Gumanitarnye i social’no-jekonomicheskie nauki. 2016; 86(1): 17–21. Russian.
  14. Kamalova ON, Zholobova IK. Osnovnye tendencii i innovacii v sisteme otechestvennogo obrazovanija. Gumanitarnye i social’nye nauki. 2016; (1): 38–48. Russian.
  15. Kartashova EA, Shapoval GN. Socializirujushhij potencial vneauditornoj dejatel’nosti studenta-medika. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovanija i innovacii. 2016; 58(2): 689–692. Russian.
  16. Kartashova EA, Shapoval GN. Sredstva i formy social’noj aktivnosti studentov vuza. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovanija i innovacii. 2016; 57(1): 698–704. Russian.
  17. Shapoval GN. Formirovanie nravstvennyh kachestv lichnosti studentov vuza v kontekste patrioticheskogo vospitanija. V sbornike: NAUKA SEGODNJa: vyzovy i reshenija materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Nauchnyj centr «Disput». Vologda. 2016; 168–171. Russian.
  18. Spicin VA. Biohimicheskij polimorfizm cheloveka. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta. 1985; 214 s. Russian.
  19. Potter VR. Biojetika — most v budushhee. M.: Editorial URSS, 2010; 370 s.
  20. Yudin BG. Transgumanizm: sverhgumaniazi ili antigumanizm? Chelovek: vyhod za predely M. 2018; 470 s. Russian.
  21. Agar N. How to defend genetic enhancement. Medical enhancement and posthumanity. Springer, Dordrecht. 2008; 55–67.
  22. Svitnev KN. Pravovye i jetichsekie aspekty posmertnoj reprodukcii. Pravovye voprosy v zdravoohranenii. 2011; 6: 30–43. Russian.
  23. Ageeva NA. Biojeticheskoe izmerenie problem zhizni i smerti cheloveka v uslovijah innovacionnogo obshhestva. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovanija i innovacii. 2014; 41(9–2): 5–10. Russian.
  24. Pagel C, Utley M, Ray S. Covid-19: how to triage effectively in a pandemic. BMJ Opinion. 2020. Available from URL: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/03/09/covid-19-triage-in-a-pandemic-is-even-thornier-than-you-might-think/ (accessed: 21.07.2024).
  25. Nabi J. How bioethics can shape artificial intelligence and machine learning. Hastings Center Report. 2018; 48(5): 10–13.
  26. Nabi J. How bioethics can shape artificial intelligence and machine learning. Hastings Center Report. 2018; 48(5): 10–13.
  27. Jonas G. Princip otvetstvennosti: Opyt jetiki dlja tehnologicheskoj civilizacii. M.: Ajris-press. 2004; 479 s. Russian.
  28. Schneider P, et al. Rethinking drug design in the artificial intelligence era. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2020; 19(5): 353–364.
  29. Vjalyh NA. Metodologija sociologicheskogo issledovanija neravenstva v dostupe k medicinskoj pomoshhi: nauchno-metodicheskoe posobie. Rostov-na-Donu. 2013; 186 s. Russian.
  30. Vjalyh NA. Strategii potreblenija medicinskoj pomoshhi: sociologicheskij analiz: monografija. Rostov-na-Donu. 2015; 288 s. Russian.
  31. Yudin BG. Moral’, biologija, pravo. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2001; 71(9): 775–83. Russian.
  32. Tishhenko PD. Institualizacija jeticheskoj refleksii v social’no raspredeljonnom proizvodstve biomedicinskih znanij. Istorija i filosofija nauki v jepohu peremen: sbornik nauchnyh statej: V 6 tomah. M. 2018; 6: 5–7. Russian.
  33. Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare and research. Bioethics Briefing Note. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2018; 1–8.