ORIGINAL RESEARCH

History of biomedical research in Russia: ethics lessons for the future

About authors

St. Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Olga I. Kubar
ul. Mira 14, St. Petersburg, 197101; ur.tsil@rabuko

About paper

Author contribution: Olga I. Kubar – examination of archives and historical documents to analyze the formation and development of research ethics in Russia; comparison of historical documents of Russia related to informing patients about a modern standard of ethical regulation, ethical commentary on the trial of former soldiers of the Japanese army accused of manufacturing and use of bacteriological weapon in the city of Khabarovsk in 1949. The value of prohibition ethical inevitability is evaluated to protect future generations.

Received: 2021-04-21 Accepted: 2021-05-28 Published online: 2021-10-15
|

This work is the author's commentary on events and documents that are important for the correct interpretation of the history on bioethics and the search for a moral basis for preventing ethical catastrophes in the future. The real reason for turning to the subject of the article was an in-depth study of the roots of the formation of ethical self-awareness and ethical legal awareness in Russia, which we presented earlier in the previous issue of the journal of Medical Ethics (2021, V. 9, No. 1.). The historical memory of the Nuremberg trial and the realities of the humanitarian catastrophe of the COVID-19 pandemic certainly give a special impetus to the development of this topic. Important issue is a special request of the journal editors to write this particular article. The reason is the author's discovery and presentation of the unique and forgotten documents of extraordinary importance, as well as the strategic focus of the journal's policy on an objective presentation of the facts of national ethics / bioethics in order to form the integrity of the role and influence of Russia and to improve the quality of education in this area.

Keywords: informed voluntary consent, bacteriological weapons, historical responsibility, solidarity, protection of future generations

КОММЕНТАРИИ (0)