ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Hospital-based ABC analysis of pharmacotherapy in kidney and liver transplantation
1 Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
2 Yaroslavl State Medical University, Yaroslavl, Russia
Correspondence should be addressed: Daria S. Fokina
Minin and Pozharsky Sq., 10/1, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia; ur.liam@4anikofsd
Author contribution: Fokina DS — study concept and design, source analysis, writing a text; Zhukova OV — study concept and design, text editing; Khokhlov AL — text editing.
Kidney and liver diseases hold a prominent place among disorders associated with the loss of labor capacity and need in high-cost therapy due to significant prevalence in the population, rapid decline of life quality, and high mortality of patients. They also result in the need of using costly methods of replacement therapy in end-stage disease such as dialysis and kidney transplantation [1].
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a gradual damage or loss of kidney function over 3 months under the influence of various etiological factors. Its anatomical basis is replacement of normal anatomical structures with fibrosis, which results in its dysfunction [2].
Liver failure occurs when the liver can no longer function. There is acute liver failure (quick loss of liver function that occurs during several days or weeks) and chronic liver failure (a slow decline in liver function during months or years).
Prevalence of chronic kidney and liver disease can be compared with such socially significant diseases as hypertension, diabetes, obesity and metabolic syndrome. Signs of kidney damage and/or decrease in glomerular filtration rate are found among at least every tenth representative of the general population [1].
Kidney and liver transplantation is currently the most effective and frequently the only radical, though costly, method of treatment of patients with end-stage chronic kidney/liver diseases.
Rapid growth of a number of patients with an impaired function of kidneys and liver is not a highly specialized, but general medical interdisciplinary issue with serious social and economic consequences for the RF.
Satisfied population needs in novel medicinal preparations with high effectiveness and novel medical devices relate to one of the most essential healthcare issues of the modern world [3].
Analysis of the structure of using medicinal preparations (MPs) allows to obtain data on their use in clinical practice, compare countries, regions and various healthcare systems, and examine a change in the use of MPs over time. Examination of consumption of MPs allows to establish their non-rational use, and conduct targeted activities to optimize costly drug therapy [4].
Assessing the rational use of expenses on pharmacological support is one of the most actual tasks in modern healthcare.
The study objective was to perform ABC analysis of MPs used in hospital-based transplantation of kidneys and liver.
The objective of the research was to perform a pharmacoepidemiology analysis of MPs used during hospitalbased transplantation of kidneys and liver.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was carried out at a 200 bed multi-specialty hospital of Nizhny Novgorod, where both therapeutic and high-tech surgical aid was provided.
Medical cards of patients (n=34) who underwent pharmacotherapy during kidney and liver transplantation in 2018 and quarters I–III of 2019 were the study object.
ABC analysis of MPs used in therapy of kidney and liver failure was used throughout the study. All medicinal preparations were divided into three classes based on costs and taking into account their international non-proprietary name (INN): class A (10–20% of MPs with 80% of monetary funds spent), class B (10–20% of MPs with 15% of monetary funds spent), and class C (60–80% of MPs with 5% of monetary funds spent) [5]. ABC-analysis includes as follows:
- Forming a list of MPs indicating trade names, prices per a counting unit used at a healthcare institution within a certain interval.
- Calculating the percentage (%) of total expenditure: Total expenditure = (cost of MPs/ total expenditure on all MPs) × 100
- Distribution of MPs in descending order of costs.
- Calculating the cumulative percentage by summing up the percentage of expenses on every MP in descending order of their percentage in the sum of expenses.
- Allocation of classes A, B and C.
- Final analysis of every MP to determine whether it is reasonable to use the MP in case of certain nosological forms of diseases found at a healthcare institution in accordance with the profile of the rendered medical aid and acting clinical protocols [5].
The obtained data were utilized to form a database analyzed using MSO Excel and ABC-analysis. Expenses on the groups of MPs used in therapy during kidney or liver transplantation were estimated with the help of ABC analysis.
STUDY RESULTS
MPs from 52 pharmacotherapeutic groups were used in pharmacotherapy during the analyzed period. There were 98 positions of MPs as per INN.
The groups with MPs being used 3 or more times have been identified among pharmacotherapeutic groups. Other pharmacotherapeutic groups with MPs being used once or twice have been included into a separate group (tab. 1).
In therapy of liver and kidney transplantation, the largest expenditure (group A) was for such a pharmacotherapeutic group as immunosuppressant medications (with 85.8% of share of expenses) (mycophenolic acid, immunoglobulin antimocytic and basiliximab) (tab. 2).
Priority MPs include mycophenolic acid with the largest expenditure (with 45.35% share of expenses) and immunoglobulin antimocytic (with 23.35% share of expenses).
Group B includes the MPs related to pharmacotherapeutic groups such as anticoagulants (with 3.84% share of expenses), regulators of water-electrolyte balance and acid-base balance including antidotes (with 5.51% share of expenses). These MPs were used both among patients who underwent therapy during liver and kidney transplantation, and among patients who were on supportive therapy.
Group C included the rest of MPs. Based on pharmacotherapeutic groups, it is possible to differentiate between quinolones/fluroquinolones (with 0.45% share of expenses) and hematopoietic regulators (with 0.35% share of expenses).
CONCLUSIONS
ABC-analysis is a relatively simple pharmacoeconomic tool, which allows a professional from a medical institution to assess whether the medicinal agents were used by hospitals in a reasonable way, and also to determine the most problematic issues of unreasonable use of medicinal agents.
Based on the results of the study it has been found out that MPs belonging to 52 pharmacotherapeutic groups were used in pharmacotherapy during the analyzed period. Total number of used MPs (as per INN) was 98. The conducted ABC analysis has shown that group A includes mycophenolic acid, immunoglobulin antimocytic and basiliximab (with 85.80% share of expenses), a group of immunosuppressive agents with the largest expenditure during kidney and liver transplantation.